The air in that metal box had a metallic, dusty taste, thick and flat, like chewing on cheap zinc. It was 6:41 AM, and I was suspended between the third and fourth floors, listening to the frantic, muffled chimes of my phone searching for a signal it couldn’t find. That twenty-minute silence, that powerless, airless suspension, felt exactly like the flavor of a company-wide memo announcing a ‘strategic realignment of core competencies.’
That’s the opening scene, isn’t it? The communication is supposed to move us forward, to inform, but instead, it traps us. It leaves us hanging, unable to gauge if this means massive layoffs are coming, or if the coffee machine is finally being upgraded. Because the language, the corporate speak, the jargon-it is designed to be the opposite of what it claims to be. It promises clarity but delivers opacity. It promises connection but establishes an impenetrable barrier.
Contradiction: The Shield
I hate it, and yet, I use it. Just last week, I caught myself saying, “I don’t have the bandwidth for that right now.” Jargon is the acceptable, sanitized way to deliver uncomfortable truth or, more often, to dodge truth entirely. It’s a linguistic shield.
We’ve mistaken complexity for intelligence. We believe if we can string together enough nouns ending in ‘-ization’ and ‘-ness,’ we must be doing important work. But the true measure of expertise is the ability to take the complex and render it simple. Not simplistic, but clear. That’s what accountability requires.
The Mason and The Metric of Truth
“
When Claire J.D. talks about ‘spalling’ or ‘tuckpointing,’ she is describing a precise failure or a precise intervention. There is no ambiguity. She means: the wall is failing. Fix it now. The cost of miscommunication is immediate and concrete: collapse.
– Historic Building Masonry Standard
In our world, the collapse is slower, quieter, and usually occurs in the form of employee burnout or market confusion. When a manager asks you to “circle back to synergize our core competencies,” they are doing two things simultaneously: they are avoiding saying what they actually want (usually, ‘write a new sales report’) and they are protecting themselves from being wrong. The language gives them an escape clause before the work even begins.
The Cost of Evasion (Comparison)
Actual Action: Exit Market
Action: Stop Selling
This is why I maintain that corporate jargon is not just annoying; it is the empty calorie language of organizational anxiety. It fills the air, makes everyone feel like they are nourished and informed, but provides zero substance.
The Price of Fog
I know this first-hand. Last year, I misinterpreted a memo from a key client regarding their ‘strategic realignment’-a term I thought meant shifting focus from Product A to Product B. It actually meant they were exiting the Product A market entirely. My mistake cost us $171 in wasted resources and scheduling errors. The client, when confronted, was baffled. “We were perfectly clear,” they insisted. “We said we were executing a proactive pivot to maximize shareholder value.” They felt the jargon did the heavy lifting of explanation. It didn’t. It built a fog wall between us.
This linguistic obfuscation works exactly counter to situations where precision is critical. If you are standing on the seventh floor and smoke is pouring into the hallway, you need the word
EXIT. You do not need the phrase ‘engage in a controlled, phased egress protocol.’
That is the fundamental reason why organizations like The Fast Fire Watch Company rely on standardized, non-negotiable terminology. Their communication protocol must be immediate, direct, and universally understandable, because what they manage cannot be vague: fire, threat, safety.
“
In the corporate world, the jargon acts as a status marker. It’s an inside code that proves you belong to the management layer. But belonging comes at the cost of exclusion.
– Observation on Hierarchy
When 11 people in a room understand the phrase ‘holistic integration strategy,’ and the other 51 people stare blankly, a hierarchy has been established. The excluded group doesn’t feel informed; they feel managed. And managed people are rarely motivated people. They certainly aren’t innovative people.
The Plumb Line of Honesty
I often think about the physical reality of communication. Claire J.D., the mason, uses a plumb line. It establishes a perfect vertical, an absolute standard against which every deviation is measured. Jargon, conversely, is a deliberately slack line. It sags, it shifts, it allows for infinite deviation, meaning you never actually have to stand perfectly upright and own your decisions. Claire, operating with gravity as her constant judge, cannot afford that kind of looseness. Her whole job revolves around a concept we seem to have lost in the boardroom: tensile strength.
Zero
Infinite
I’ve tried to fight it. It was exhausting. A memo titled ‘Initiating a Scalable, Best-Practices Digital Transformation Infrastructure’ became ‘We are buying new computers.’ The response was immediate pushback. Not because the translation was wrong, but because the simplicity sounded… cheap. It lacked the necessary gravitas. That’s the real tragedy: we’ve convinced ourselves that simple truth lacks authority.
The Price Tag of Obscurity
Brittle Foundation
Built on buzzwords; cannot withstand pressure.
Confusing Post-Mortem
Using failure language to analyze failure.
Loss of Soul
Simple truth is mistaken for cheapness.
The Plumb Line Standard
We need to stop pretending that using three words where one will suffice is a sign of professionalism. It’s a sign of fear-fear of being transparent, fear of being wrong, fear of being seen as simply human. We need to demand that communication, especially from the top, serves the purpose of transmission, not evasion.